b2broker
B2BROKER

Providing Liquidity: How It Works and Why It Matters

ArticlesLiquidityBusiness Tips
Upd
11m
Providing Liquidity.png

Liquidity is the backbone of financial markets, and brokers, traders, and everyone in between rely on providers to execute orders, access real-time prices, and support continuous trading.

The role of liquidity providers extends to spread quality, execution certainty, and overall market stability, making LPs a core component across all asset classes.

So, how do these providers actually work? What are the mechanics of liquidity provision, and how do brokers contribute to the overall market efficiency? This guide will dive deeper into the workings of LPs, how they distribute pricing and execution capabilities, and how brokers can evolve into a fully fledged provider.

Key Takeaways

  • Providing liquidity means committing capital and execution responsibility to keep markets continuously tradable.
  • Brokers can provide liquidity through agency, market-making, or hybrid models with different risk and capital requirements.
  • Liquidity provision introduces inventory, volatility, and operational risk that must be actively managed.
  • Using turnkey liquidity services allows brokers to participate without building a full market-making infrastructure.

Discover the Tools That Power 500+ Brokerages

Explore our complete ecosystem — from liquidity to CRM to trading infrastructure.


What Does Providing Liquidity Mean in Practice?

Providing liquidity means committing capital and execution responsibility so other market participants can trade seamlessly, without waiting for a matching counterparty or causing excessive price impact. Top-tier financial institutions ensure that markets remain continuously tradable by being ready to match buy or sell orders at quoted prices, even when supply and demand are temporarily unstable.

In practice, LPs act as counterparties either directly or indirectly. Directly, they trade on their own balance sheet, and indirectly, they absorb short-term mismatches between buyers to manage the resulting exposure.

Liquidity defined.png

LPs' role goes beyond simply distributing prices and quotes. Liquidity provision involves execution responsibility and risk. For example, when markets move quickly or order flow becomes one-sided, LPs are exposed to higher volatility risk, but they get compensated through spreads, transaction fees, rebates, or a combination of multiple models.

At its core, liquidity provision works through three main functions:

  • Continuously quote bid and ask prices to keep assets tradable at all times
  • Absorb short-term supply and demand imbalances by taking the opposite side of trades
  • Earn compensation through spreads, execution fees, or exchange rebates

Why Liquidity Matters In Financial Markets

Liquidity is a primary driver of market efficiency and execution quality. Deep, reliable distribution leads to tighter spreads, lower slippage, and more predictable trade outcomes for all participants.

For brokerages, these mechanisms directly affect client satisfaction, retention, and regulatory compliance, as poor execution quality means higher churn, increasing complaints, and escalating compliance issues.

LPs are crucial for the overall market, not only brokers, because illiquid markets are fragile, fragmented, and inefficient.

This mechanism also operates as a feedback loop. Markets with consistent pricing and reliable execution attract more participants, thereby increasing trading volume and further deepening liquidity. Conversely, low-liquidity markets with thin streams reinforce poor conditions.

From a business perspective, execution quality affects trading volume, which in turn drives commissions, spreads, and long-term client value. Brokers that treat liquidity as a foundational capability rather than an additional perk are better positioned to manage growth and market stress.

Deep, Reliable Liquidity Across 10 Major Asset Classes


  • FX, Crypto, Commodities, Indices & More from One Single Margin Account

  • Tight Spreads and Ultra-Low Latency Execution

  • Seamless API Integration with Your Trading Platform

Liquidity promo

Common Liquidity Provision Models

Liquidity provision is not a one-size-fits-all function. Brokers and trading firms choose operating models based on their risk tolerance, capital structure, regulatory environment, and technology stack.

There are three models that determine the firm’s business strategy, each with distinct implications for execution, compliance, and risk exposure.

Agency (Pass-Through) Liquidity

In the agency model, the broker routes client orders directly to external sources without taking principal risk. As such, discount brokers and broker-dealers act as intermediaries, earning revenue through commissions or markups while remaining neutral to market direction.

This model offers low balance-sheet exposure and relatively simple risk management. However, it creates a high dependency on the provider’s quality, stability, and transparency, requiring guaranteed top-notch consistency, ultra-low latency, and reliable execution during volatile market conditions.

Market Making and Principal Liquidity

how market makers work.png

Market making involves quoting executable prices using the firm’s capital and acting as the direct counterparty to client trade requests. As such, revenue is generated mainly from spreads, while risk is managed through inventory control, hedging, and continuous rebalancing.

This model provides maximum control over pricing and execution but introduces significant exposure to inventory risk, adverse selection, and volatility spikes. Therefore, successful market makers require disciplined risk controls, robust technology, and constant monitoring.

Hybrid Liquidity Models

Hybrid models combine elements of agency and principal execution. They internalize part of the client’s flow while routing excess or higher-risk exposure to external sources. Internalization thresholds are mostly defined by position limits, volatility conditions, or instrument specifications.

These models rely on dynamic order routing, real-time exposure monitoring, and automated hedging, making transparency critical to make the right routing decisions that affect pricing and client satisfaction.

Who Provides Liquidity in Modern Markets?

There are several liquidity providers who contribute to supplying pricing and quoting capabilities. Let’s explain these market players and how they contribute.

Banks and Prime Brokers

Tier-1 banks and prime brokers provide access to interbank markets and redistribute pricing to institutional brokers. Their role is supported by large balance sheets, regulatory capital, and deep market access.

Entry thresholds are usually high, with significant volume commitments, credit requirements, and strict onboarding processes.

Market Makers and HFT Firms

Algorithmic trading firms and high-frequency trading brokers provide liquidity through continuous automated quoting. These entities focus on speed, inventory turnover, and tight spreads in highly liquid instruments.

HFT firms and automated market makers rely on advanced technology and statistical logic models rather than balance sheets, making them particularly influential in fast-paced, online trading environments.

Non-Bank and Crypto Liquidity Providers

Non-bank liquidity providers aggregate pricing from multiple trading venues, centralized and decentralized exchanges, and OTC desks. They play a critical role in crypto and multi-asset markets, bridging fragmented liquidity pools to simplify trading in cryptocurrencies and digital derivatives. Their technology is a competitive advantage, leveraging cutting-edge engines to aggregate prices, route execution, and manage risks.

Infrastructure Required to Provide Liquidity

liquidity distribution routes.png

Providing market liquidity at scale requires a sophisticated infrastructure designed to provide continuous pricing, execution, and risk monitoring. These components must operate as a tightly integrated system, as delays or inconsistencies between pricing and execution can amplify risk.

Core infrastructure elements include:

  • Price streaming and quote generation engines that continuously update and distribute rates. 
  • Order routing and execution logic that matches orders with venues for the best fills and fastest execution times.
  • Real-time exposure monitoring to minimize price impact and rejection rates.
  • Latency management between components to oversee jitter, delays, and trigger failover systems when thresholds are crossed.

While speed matters, predictability and stability are often more important. The liquidity infrastructure must be able to recognize patterns, market changes, and system behavior to predict changing patterns before they cause serious financial losses.

An effective ecosystem enables firms to respond to changing market conditions without manual intervention, maintaining firm quotes and controlled risk even during periods of stress.

Launch your own Liquidity Business – Turnkey Solution


  • Ready-to-Go Setup with Technology, Licenses & Connections

  • Access to Deep Multi-Asset PoP Liquidity Pools

  • Built-In Risk Management and Reporting Systems

LP TK

Risk Management When Providing Liquidity

Liquidity provision inherently exposes firms to inventory risk, adverse selection, volatility spikes, and counterparty risk. These risks must be embedded directly into execution workflows and minimized beforehand, because they cannot be managed effectively after trades occur.

Key control tools include:

  • Dynamic spread adjustment
  • Position and exposure limits
  • Hedging and netting logic
  • Session-based and event-aware risk rules

Together, these mechanisms allow liquidity providers to remain active while constraining downside exposure, ultimately to make risk measurable, visible, and responsive in real time.

Providing Liquidity Across Multiple Asset Classes

Liquidity provision differs across asset classes due to variations in market structure, trading hours, volatility, and settlement models.

For example, Forex liquidity relies on continuous interbank pricing, while crypto markets operate across fragmented, 24/7 venues with distinct custody and counterparty considerations. Indices and CFDs, on the other hand, introduce additional layers of synthetic pricing and risk transfer.

As such, multi-asset liquidity provision requires unified monitoring and consistent risk frameworks to centralize visibility, track system anomalies, and configure triggers with standardized thresholds and limits.

Plan Your Liquidity Infrastructure

Get Multi-asset liquidity, pre-integrated risk controls, 24/7 pricing, and more in one solution

When to Build Liquidity Capabilities vs Use Liquidity as a Service

Now the question is: shall you build these instances from scratch or get a ready-to-use solution? What’s the difference?

Building in-house liquidity operations offers control but requires significant investment in capital, technology, and operational expertise. Small-scale brokers or FinTechs looking to directly benefit from the lucrative liquidity market will struggle to set up these technologies from the outset.

Liquidity as a service provides faster time to market, lower upfront costs, and access to mature infrastructure. They leverage tested-and-proven systems developed by experts to shorten the learning curve, accelerate time-to-market, and compete with key players quickly and more effectively.

For many brokers, external financial services allow participation in liquidity without rebuilding commodity components, while still retaining control over execution logic and client experience. The decision depends on scale, strategic priorities, and risk appetite.

How Brokers Can Operationalize Liquidity Provision

Brokers typically begin by defining their execution and risk model, selecting asset coverage and target clients, integrating pricing and execution infrastructure, implementing real-time risk controls, and continuously monitoring execution quality and costs.

Rolling out capabilities gradually allows firms to validate assumptions, refine controls, and scale responsibly. Here’s an entry roadmap: 

  1. Define the execution and risk model, determining when flow is externalized, internalized, or automatically hedged
  2. Select asset coverage and target clients based on order book depth, trading behavior, and risk characteristics
  3. Integrate pricing and execution infrastructure to ensure consistent quotes, low latency, and efficient routing
  4. Implement real-time risk controls, including exposure limits, automated hedging, and position monitoring
  5. Continuously monitor execution quality and costs, tracking spreads, slippage, fill ratios, and expenses

Start Your Liquidity Provider Company

Get pre-integrated infrastructure to earn from liquidity, manage risks, and launch in a few days

How Liquidity Models Evolve as Brokers Scale

Most brokers do not start out trying to “provide liquidity”. They begin with an agency model, sending all client orders to external execution sources. It is the simplest way to launch: low risk, no balance-sheet exposure, and fewer operational moving parts.

As trading activity increases and trading patterns become clearer, brokers introduce partial internalization, keeping some flow in-house while still hedging externally when exposure reaches defined limits.

This is where hybrid models come in. Brokers do not suddenly become market makers. Instead, they internalize low-risk flow and rely on external liquidity for larger, directional, or fast-moving exposure.

At higher volumes, some brokers take this a step further for specific instruments (such as crypto assets) or trading hours (such as after hours). The goal still is not to run a full market-making desk, but to improve pricing consistency, reduce execution uncertainty, and stay resilient during volatile periods.

What really distinguishes a broker is whether pricing, execution, and risk management are properly connected and visible in real time, because without that foundation, deeper liquidity involvement quickly becomes risky.

Moving Forward With Scalable Liquidity Operations

Liquidity provision has evolved into a technology-enabled business function accessible to brokers and trading firms of varying sizes. Long-term success depends on infrastructure reliability, disciplined risk management, and transparent execution processes.

B2BROKER’s Liquidity Provider Turnkey Solution simplifies this process by embedding scalable, multi-asset liquidity operations and providing access to aggregation, institutional execution, and robust risk management, without having to build and maintain complex infrastructure in-house. It offers a plug-and-play liquidity system that enables you to easily configure your infrastructure and integrates distribution modules, bridge hubs, trading platforms, payment gateways, and more through a centralized dashboard.

Have a Question About Your Brokerage Setup?

Our team is here to guide you — whether you're starting out or expanding.


Frequently Asked Questions about Liquidity Provision

What does it mean to provide liquidity in financial markets?

Providing liquidity means committing capital and executable prices so other market participants can trade immediately without causing excessive price movement. Liquidity providers act as counterparties by absorbing short-term imbalances between buyers and sellers, helping markets function smoothly. In return, they earn compensation through spreads, trading fees, or execution incentives.

Can brokers provide liquidity without acting as full market makers?

Yes. Brokers can provide liquidity through agency or hybrid models by routing client orders to external liquidity sources or selectively internalizing flow while hedging exposure externally. These approaches allow brokers to support execution quality without committing large balance sheets or assuming full principal risk.

What risks are involved in providing liquidity?

Liquidity provision exposes firms to inventory risk, adverse selection, and sudden volatility during market events. Operational risks also arise from latency, system failures, or poor integration between pricing and execution systems. Effective risk management requires real-time controls embedded directly into execution workflows.

How does providing liquidity differ across asset classes?

Liquidity provision varies by asset class due to differences in market structure, trading hours, volatility, and settlement models. Forex liquidity relies on continuous interbank pricing, while crypto liquidity operates across fragmented, 24/7 venues with different custody considerations. Multi-asset liquidity requires unified monitoring and risk frameworks to manage these differences consistently.

Subscribe to our newsletter